Homeport Checked on 7 Sep 2026

1948 cases after Law 74/2025: can I still file one?

You can still file, and whether the 2025 generational cap applies to your case is genuinely unsettled as of 7 September 2026. Official guidance treats article 3-bis as applying to judicial claims filed after the cutoff of 27 March 2025; several Italian tribunals have held that the reform does not govern 1948 claims; no binding decision has resolved that split.

This page marks the line between what is settled and what is a live dispute, because most pages on this topic pick a side and sell it.

What a 1948 case is, in one paragraph

Before the Italian Constitution took effect on 1 January 1948, Italian law did not let a mother transmit citizenship to her child on the same terms as a father. Italian courts have long held that the discrimination cannot stand, and they recognise those maternal lines. Consulates do not: administratively the pre-1948 maternal step is still treated as a break, which is why the remedy is a court case and why it carries the name of the year.

Settled, contested, and closed

Settled

  • A case filed by 23:59 Rome time on 27 March 2025 stays under the old rules. Condition (b) of article 3-bis says so, and the courts have confirmed it repeatedly.
  • Consulates continue to refuse pre-1948 maternal lines, so the route is judicial by design.
  • A 1948 argument repairs a step in the chain. It is not itself a gate in article 3-bis.

Contested

Whether article 3-bis governs a 1948 claim filed after the cutoff. Ministry guidance says yes; a number of tribunals have ruled that the reform does not apply to these constitutional claims. This is unresolved, and different courtrooms are giving different answers.

Effectively closed

Using a 1948 case as a way round the generational limit. Where article 3-bis is applied, a claimant whose nearest Italian ancestor is a great-grandparent does not become eligible because a woman appears in the line. The two problems are different problems.

The question to put to your own file

Answer this before anything else
Setting the pre-1948 woman aside for a moment, does your line pass a gate in article 3-bis on its own? Is there a pre-cutoff filing, or a parent or grandparent who held only Italian citizenship on the day you were born, or a parent with two continuous years in Italy?

If the answer is yes, the 1948 argument is doing what it does best: fixing a chain that is otherwise sound, in a forum that accepts it. If the answer is no, your case depends on winning the contested question above before it ever reaches the maternal-line argument, and that is a materially riskier proposition to fund.

The money, current as of today

Court filing fee, per petitioner600 euros
Italian counselquoted, not fixed
Venueancestor's comune of origin

The old figure of €286 covering a whole family has not applied since 1 January 2025. In a joint family case each petitioner pays €600 separately. Published lawyer quotes we found on 7 September 2026 differ by roughly a factor of three, so we publish no average; ask for the number in writing.

Two procedural changes that make these cases harder

Where this route genuinely needs a lawyer

This one does. A contested question of law, an Italian venue, mandatory documentary proof and a fee per head are not a self-help situation. We publish the rules and the sources; we do not review cases, and on this route the honest recommendation is Italian counsel before money moves.

Sources, checked on 7 September 2026
Related answers

One next step

Find out whether your line stands on its own under article 3-bis before you price a 1948 case, because that answer changes what you are buying: a chain repair in a friendly forum, or a bet on an unresolved question of law.

Run the free check, about two minutes

It has a branch for a pre-1948 maternal step, and it tells you when a lawyer is the honest answer.